Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rooney v. City of Philadelphia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 22, 2009

ERIC ROONEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Eduardo C. Robreno, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22 day of April 2009, it is hereby

ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum,

(1) the City's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 76) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

(2) SEPTA's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 77) is GRANTED;

(3) AMTRAK's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 79) is GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

(1) AMTRAK's motion in limine and motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. nos. 78, 91) is DENIED as moot;

(2) AMTRAK's motions for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 90) is GRANTED;

(3) the City's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 93) is GRANTED;

(4) SEPTA's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 89) is GRANTED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090422

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.