Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rooney v. City of Philadelphia

April 22, 2009

ERIC ROONEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Eduardo C. Robreno, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22 day of April 2009, it is hereby

ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum,

(1) the City's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 76) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

(2) SEPTA's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 77) is GRANTED;

(3) AMTRAK's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 79) is GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

(1) AMTRAK's motion in limine and motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. nos. 78, 91) is DENIED as moot;

(2) AMTRAK's motions for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 90) is GRANTED;

(3) the City's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 93) is GRANTED;

(4) SEPTA's motion for leave to file sur-reply (doc. no. 89) is GRANTED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090422

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.