Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Marsden v. McGrady

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 17, 2009

RICHARD MARSDEN PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES MCGRADY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jan E. Dubois, J.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Richard Marsden (Document No. 1, filed November 28, 2008), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo dated March 31, 2009, petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation Filed on March 31, 2009 (Document No. 4, filed April 16, 2009), and the record in this case, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo dated March 31, 2009 is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner's Objections to Report and Recommendation Filed on March 31, 2009, are OVERRULED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Richard Marsden, is DISMISSED as untimely; and,

4. A certificate of appealability WILL NOT ISSUE because reasonable jurists would not debate this Court's rulings. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

20090417

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.