Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Seigfried v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 17, 2009

WILLIAM SEIGFRIED AND MARLENE SEIGFRIED, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2009, after defendant General Electric Corporation removed this action, which the plaintiffs, William Seigfried and his wife Marlene Seigfried, had filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, Pennsylvania, and after a motion to remand was submitted by the plaintiffs, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiffs, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 183), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to remand (Docket No. 67) is denied.

20090417

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.