Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Wilks

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 3, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ALTIMONT WILKS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2009, upon consideration of defendant's motion (Doc. 120) to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and of defendant's election form (Doc. 27), electing to have the court rule upon the motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and it appearing that petitioner contends that his possession of certain drugs and firearms used to calculate his offense level were not part of the charged offense conduct, (Doc. 120 §§ 12.A-.B, at 5), that he is entitled to a sentence reduction for post-trial acceptance of responsibility, (id. § 12.C, at 5), and that his sentence should be further reduced pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) and recent retroactive amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines,*fn1 (id. § 12.D, at 6), and it further appearing that the motion was filed within the prescribed limitations period, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) ("A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section."); United States v. Davies, 394 F.3d 182, 186 n.2 (3d Cir. 2005) (stating that, where the defendant has taken a direct appeal, the § 2255 limitations period begins to run "on the later of (1) the date on which the Supreme Court affirms the conviction and sentence on the merits or denies the defendant's timely filed petition for certiorari, or (2) the date on which the defendant's time for filing a timely petition for certiorari review expires" (citing Kapral v. United States, 166 F.3d 565, 577 (3d Cir. 1999))), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the motion (Doc. 120) on the United States Attorney.

2. The United States Attorney shall file an answer to the motion (Doc. 120) on or before May 4, 2009. See R. GOVERNING § 2255 CASES 4(b), 5.

3. Defendant shall be permitted to file a reply on or before May 20, 2009. See R. GOVERNING § 2255 CASES 5(d).

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.