Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Reed v. Court of Common Pleas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 3, 2009

THOMAS L. REED, SR., PLAINTIFF,
v.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 21, 2008 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 37], filed on March 17, 2009, recommended that: the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Court of Common Pleas [Doc. No. 12] be granted; the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Brad Foulk [Doc. No. 31] be granted; the "Motion to Let Court Know that Common Pleas Court and Judges Below is a part of the Action" filed by Plaintiff [Doc. No. 33] be denied as futile; and the "Motion to Correct Complaint" filed by Plaintiff [Doc. No. 35] be denied as futile. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motions and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2009;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Court of Common Pleas [Doc. No. 12] is GRANTED; the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Brad Foulk [Doc. No. 31] is GRANTED; the "Motion to Let Court Know that Common Pleas Court and Judges Below is a part of the Action" filed by Plaintiff [Doc. No. 33] is DENIED as futile; and the "Motion to Correct Complaint" filed by Plaintiff [Doc. No. 35] is DENIED as futile.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 37] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on March 17, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

20090403

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.