Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Tennis

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 1, 2009

JESSE O. JOHNSON, JR., PETITIONER
v.
FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

(Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2009, upon consideration of petitioner's motion (Doc. 24) to strike respondents' answer (Doc. 17) and motion to dismiss (Doc. 16), wherein petitioner expresses confusion regarding the clarity of the numbered paragraphs in respondents' motion (Doc. 16) to dismiss, and it appearing that respondents' have filed an amended motion (Doc. 26) to dismiss, which rectifies the deficiencies identified by petitioner's motion (Doc. 24) to strike,*fn1 it is hereby

ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion (Doc. 24) to strike is DENIED as moot.

2. Respondents' first motion (Doc. 16) to dismiss is DENIED. The denial does not reflect the court's disposition on the merits of the amended motion (Doc. 26).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.