IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 20, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FREDERICK H. BANKS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge
Frederick Banks ("Defendant") together with two other inmates at the Federal Correctional Institution, Yazoo City, Mississippi,*fn1 has filed a pleading entitled "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b); and Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; and Notice of Appearance," Docket No. 564. According to Defendant Banks -- who holds himself out, under penalty of perjury (28 U.S.C. § 1746) as a "constitutional lawyer" "currently licensed to practice law in a tribal court" -- the issue is whether the respective district courts which sentenced the defendants lacked jurisdiction over them, all of whom were allegedly "Indians outside of 'Indian Country'" at the time they were arrested and convicted. (Docket No. 564 at 9.)
As a "constitutional lawyer," Defendant Banks should be aware that the argument that this Court lacked jurisdiction over him -- no matter what the basis of that argument -- must be raised in a petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant filed such a motion to vacate two days after judgment was entered against him and has subsequently filed two amended motions. (See Docket Nos. 432, 490, and 500.) The Court will consider all arguments regarding jurisdiction when Defendant has exhausted his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
The Motion filed at Docket No. 564 is denied in its entirety.