IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 20, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FREDERICK H. BANKS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge
Frederick Banks ("Defendant") has filed a pleading entitled "Motion for Reconsideration of Order Entered on July 28, 2008 (Doc. 560); and Motion for Summary Judgment," Docket No. 561. In the affidavit attached to the motion, Defendant argues the Court should stay the motion for a new trial pending the outcome of his appeal.
In Docket No. 560, the Court considered Defendant's motion for a new trial; the motion was denied without prejudice for possible reconsideration after Defendant's appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit was decided. Despite Defendant's urging that this Court "make a definative [sic] memorandum and state whether it is inclined to grant or deny the motion for a new trial or in the alternative to hold the motion in abeyance," the Court's decision on the motion for a new trial could hardly be stated more definitively than it was in the July 28, 2008 Order. In order to clarify the Court's previous order, however, Defendant's motion for a new trial, timely filed at Docket No. 557, is stayed pending the ultimate decision of the Court of Appeals.
As to Defendant's "motion for summary judgment," the subject of that motion is unclear since his only argument in that regard is "an evidentiary hearing is requested along with summary judgment since the Government conceded the issue."
Defendant's motion at Docket No. 561 is therefore granted insofar as he seeks a stay of a decision regarding his motion for a new trial and denied insofar as he seeks "summary judgment."
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.