IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 12, 2009
RORY M. WALSH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN OF C.R.W., PLAINTIFF
DR. ROBERT KRANTZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2009, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion (Doc. 136) to file his motion for recusal (Doc. 137) under seal, which plaintiff requests in order to "cloak and keep from the opposition . . . the prejudicial actions of this Court in the prior action,"*fn1 (Doc. 135 at 2), and it further appearing that the referred-to orders of court constitute publicly available records, and that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 137) to recuse contains no privileged or confidential information, see Secureinfo Corp. v. Bukstel, No. Civ. A. 03-CV-679, 2003 WL 23112409, at *2 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 16, 2003) (unsealing civil motion when it contained no privileged or confidential information), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 136) to file under seal is DENIED.