Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

See v. Fink

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 16, 2009

ERNEST EUGENE SEE, PLAINTIFF
v.
TIMOTHY FINK, CHARLES SLEEGER, AND YORK FAIR AND EXPO, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2009, upon consideration of the praecipe to end and discontinue (Doc. 48) filed by plaintiff, which represents that all claims against defendants Charles Sleeger and York Fair and Expo have been amicably resolved and requests dismissal of these defendants, and it appearing that none of the defendants have signed the praecipe, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The praecipe (Doc. 48) is CONSTRUED as a motion to dismiss defendants Charles Sleeger and York Fair and Expo under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is GRANTED as so construed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)-(2) (stating that, following service of an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff may dismiss a defendant only by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties or by seeking leave of court). The dismissal shall be with prejudice.

2. The motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34) of defendants Charles Sleeger and York Fair and Expo is DENIED as moot.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20090116

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.