IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
December 18, 2008
BRETT SWEETING, PETITIONER,
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Vanaskie
Brett Sweeting ("Petitioner"), an inmate presently confined at the State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania ("SCI-Graterford"), initiated this pro se habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The required filing fee has been paid.
Sweeting states that he was convicted of drug trafficking crimes in the Court of Common Pleas for Lycoming County in 1994 following a jury trial He received a sentence of ten (10) to twenty-seven (27) years in prison.
It appears that his action may be barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The Court will therefore direct Respondent to file a response addressing whether the petition is timely. Petitioner will be granted an opportunity to file a reply to the Respondent's submission. See United States v. Bendolph, 409 F.3d 155, 169 (3d Cir. 2005) (en banc) (a district court may raise the one-year statute of limitations on its own motion, provided that the petitioner is furnished notice and an opportunity to respond). Respondent will not be required to address the merits of the petition until the limitations issue is resolved.
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 18th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the Petition (Dkt Entry # 1 & 2) and this Order on the Respondent and the District Attorney for Lycoming County.
2. Within twenty (20) days of this Order, Respondent shall file a response, addressing whether Petitioner's habeas petition is timely filed.
3. Petitioner is granted fifteen (15) days from the date of Respondent's submission to file a reply.
Thomas I. Vanaskie United States District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.