IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
December 9, 2008
ANTHONY WHITE, PLAINTIFF
PROBATION OFFICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2008, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion (Doc. 59) for indefinite leave, filed on November 4, 2008 and it appearing that, as of the date of this order plaintiff has not filed a brief in support thereof, see L.R. 7.5 (requiring that "[w]ithin ten (10) days after the filing of any motion . . . , the party filing the same shall file a brief in support of the motion"), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 58) is DEEMED withdrawn without prejudice to plaintiff's right to refile it in a manner that complies with the Local Rules of Court. See id. ("Unless otherwise ordered by the court, if supporting legal briefs are not filed within the time provided in this rule such motion shall be deemed to be withdrawn."); McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106, 113 (1996) ("[W]e have never suggested that procedural rules in ordinary civil litigation should be interpreted to as to excuse mistakes by those who proceed without counsel.").
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.