Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mirarchi v. Britton

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 9, 2008

JOSEPH ANDREW MIRARCHI, PETITIONER,
v.
RANDALL BRITTON, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 9, 2008.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 3], filed on August 13, 2008, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be transferred to the Middle District of Pennsylvania and that the motion to appear pro hac vice [Doc. No. 2] be dismissed as moot. Plaintiff was allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections and service was made on Petitioner by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. It is further ORDERED that the motion to appear pro hac vice [Doc. No. 2] is DISMISSED as moot.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 3] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on August 13, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

20080909

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.