Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Walsh v. Krantz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 2, 2008

RORY M. WALSH, PLAINTIFF
v.
DR. ROBERT KRANTZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September, 2008, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 80), of the memorandum and order of court dated August 22, 2008 (Doc. 72), in which plaintiff seeks to reinstate the dismissed intentional infliction of emotional distress claims against defendant Krantz and to add a new Fourteenth Amendment claim on behalf of S.J.W.,*fn1 and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 80) is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.