Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

System One Holdings, L.L.C. v. Hill

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 22, 2008

SYSTEM ONE HOLDINGS, L.L.C., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RALPH HILL, JR., AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DIAMOND TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Terrence F. McVerry United States District Court Judge

ORDER OF COURT

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2008, upon consideration of DEFENDANT DIAMOND TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.'S MOTION CHALLENGING DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AS "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY EYES ONLY" (Document No. 113) and the MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DIAMOND TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.'S MOTION CHALLENGING DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AS "CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY EYES ONLY" filed by Plaintiff, System One Holdings, L.L.C. (Document No. 115), it is ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED with the following caveat:

The attorney for Diamond Technical Services, Inc. may review those documents identified and produced by Plaintiff at the August 6, 2008 oral argument (Bates HUDSON 2369-2893) with the appropriate representative of Diamond Technical Services, Inc., to whose attention those documents would have come. However, such review can only be conducted in the presence of the attorney for Diamond Technical Services, Inc. and no copies of those documents can be made or provided to Diamond Technical Services, Inc.

Further, after the review of these documents by the representative of Diamond Technical Services, Inc., counsel for Diamond shall provide counsel for Plaintiff with a signed Verification executed by the Diamond representative which states the representative's name, the date of review, that the review occurred in the presence of the attorney for Diamond, and that no copies of the documents were or provided to Diamond Technical Services, Inc.

It is further ORDERED that, upon consent of the Plaintiff, the "Confidential -Attorneys Eyes Only" designation shall be removed from the marketing brochure produced at Bates HUDSON 2890-2893. See Pl's Memo. in Opp'n at 3.

20080822

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.