AND NOW, this 10th day of June 2008, upon consideration of the report of the magistrate judge (Doc. 31), to which objections were filed (see Doc. 34), recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) be denied, and, following an independent review of the record, it appearing that petitioner seeks relief for claims of ineffective assistance of trial, appellate and collateral counsel; trial court error; and prosecutorial misconduct, perjury, and vindictive prosecution, that petitioner presented only the claim for ineffective assistance of trial counsel in his collateral proceeding under the Pennsylvania Post-Conviction Relief Act ("PCRA"), 42 PA. CONS. STAT. §§ 9541-9546, (see Mem. in Supp. of Collateral Relief Pet., Commonwealth v. Rabiega, No. 90-CR-171 (Ct. Com. Pl. Lackawanna County Aug. 29, 2005)), and thatall other claims are procedurally defaulted,*fn1 and the court concluding that the alleged failure of PCRA counsel to present petitioner's other grounds for relief on collateral review does not constitute cause for the procedural default because no constitutional right to counsel attaches during collateral review proceedings, see Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 (1991); Cristin v. Brennan, 281 F.3d 404, 420 (3d Cir. 2002) (stating that PCRA counsel's "alleged ineffective assistance cannot establish cause for . . . procedural default" because no constitutional right to counsel exists in collateral proceedings), and the court further concluding that petitioner failed to produce any new, reliable evidence to establish actual innocence beyond a reasonable doubt,*fn2 that therefore petitioner has not established that his conviction resulted in a miscarriage of justice, see Cristin, 281 F.3d at 421-22, and that petitioner failed to establish that trial counsel was ineffective for declining to call Dr. Eric Blomain because petitioner's medical records available at the time of trial do not support the proposition to which petitioner contends Dr. Blomain would have testified, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688 (1984), it is hereby ORDERED that:
a. The petition is DISMISSED in regards to the procedurally defaulted claims of ineffective assistance of appellate and PCRA counsel; trial court error; and prosecutorial conduct, perjury, and vindictive prosecution.