Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Arthurs v. Beard

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


May 27, 2008

JEFFREY THOMAS ARTHURS, PLAINTIFF
v.
JEFFREY A. BEARD, SECRETARY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; SUPERINTENDENT WILSON, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-PITTSBURGH, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; WILLIAM STICKMAN, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-PITTSBURGH, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; THOMAS BENDER, RECORDS SUPERVISOR, SCI-PITTSBURGH, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; ROCHELLE Y. KING, RECORDS SUPERVISOR, SCI-PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; RHONDA HOUSE, RECORDS SPECIALIST, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI-PITTSBURGH, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; VALERIE HALE, RECORDS SUPERVISOR, SCI-PITTSBURGH, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; JUSTIN TIMOTHY SCHAUP, RECORDS SPECIALIST, SCI-FAYETTE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; SARAH A. TRAVIS-JAMISON, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, SCI-FAYETTE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; CATHERINE C. MCVEY, CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; DANIEL FEDENIS, PAROLE SUPERVISOR, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; THOMAS DICKEY, PAROLE SUPERVISOR AT SCI-PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge

Judge Joy Flowers Conti/Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2008, after the Plaintiff, Jeffrey Thomas Arthurs, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after the Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge giving the partied until May 9, 2008 to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [9], is denied.

20080527

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.