IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 31, 2008
ED COLLINS, PLAINTIFF
MIKE GARMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2008, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 31), asking the court to vacate and/or alter the order of court dated March 25, 2008 (Doc. 30), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 31) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.