Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackson v. Ebbert

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


February 19, 2008

MICHAEL JACKSON, PETITIONER
v.
WARDEN EBBERT, DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2008, upon consideration of pro se petitioner's motion (Doc. 4) asking the court to reconsider the order of court dated February 6, 2008 (Doc. 3), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 4) is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20080219

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.