IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 19, 2008
MICHAEL JACKSON, PETITIONER
WARDEN EBBERT, DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2008, upon consideration of pro se petitioner's motion (Doc. 4) asking the court to reconsider the order of court dated February 6, 2008 (Doc. 3), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 4) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.