IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 29, 2008
DOMINICK ANTONIO BATTS, PETITIONER
R. MARTINEZ, RESPONDENT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2008, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 18), asking the court to vacate and/or alter the order of court dated January 16, 2008 (Doc. 17), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 18) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.