Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dusenbery v. Cerney

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 14, 2008

LARRY DEAN DUSENBERY, PLAINTIFF
v.
TODD CERNEY, DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2008, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 16), asking the court to vacate and/or alter the order of court dated January 8, 2008 (Doc. 15), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order,*fn1 see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 16) is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.