IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 14, 2008
LARRY DEAN DUSENBERY, PLAINTIFF
TODD CERNEY, DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2008, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 16), asking the court to vacate and/or alter the order of court dated January 8, 2008 (Doc. 15), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order,*fn1 see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 16) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge