Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scott v. Lackey

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 11, 2008

TERESA ANNE SCOTT, PLAINTIFF
v.
PAMELA WELLINGTON LACKEY AND EVAN LESLIE ADAMS, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Presently before the court is plaintiff Teresa Anne Scott's ex parte communication requesting an ex parte meeting with the court to challenge the court's finding that plaintiff is receiving the assistance of counsel and, therefore, not entitled to the usual deference given to pro se litigants (see Doc. 265 at 12). The court will deny plaintiff's request and direct plaintiff to refrain from any future ex parte communications with the court or court staff. If plaintiff wishes to challenge an order of court, she must timely file a motion for reconsideration and brief in support thereof in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this court.

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2008, upon consideration of plaintiff's request for an ex parte meeting with the court, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's request is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20080111

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.