IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
January 7, 2008
ALBERT BROOKE, PLAINTIFF
MS. STEVENS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge McClure
Albert Brooke ("Plaintiff"), an inmate presently confined in the State Correctional Institution, Coal Township, Pennsylvania ("SCI-Coal Twp."), initiated this pro se civil rights action. Named as Defendants are the following SCI-Coal Twp. officials: Mental Health Director J. Stickler and Counselors Stevens and Adams. See Record document no. 1, ¶ III. The complaint is accompanied by a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, Brooke's complaint will be dismissed, without prejudice pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(g).
Brooke alleges that the Defendants violated his due process, equal protection, and access to the courts rights by threatening to have him removed from group counseling unless he discussed his case. Id. at ¶ IV(1). Plaintiff notes that he did not wish to discuss the aspects of his criminal case during institutional counseling sessions because it was still pending in court. His Complaint adds that the Defendants' purported conduct was contrary to the terms of his plea agreement and prevented him from obtaining rehabilitation and favorable parole consideration. As relief, Brooke seeks monetary damages.
Under § 1915(g), a federal civil action by a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis is barred if he or she: has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Brooke, while incarcerated, previously initiated the following civil actions which were dismissed by this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 as being frivolous: Brooke v. Luzerne County Prison, et. al., Civil No. 4:94-CV-1024 (M.D. Pa. July 26, 1994)(complaint sua sponte dismissed as frivolous); Brooke v. Bott, Civil No. 4:94-CV-453 (M.D. Pa. April 25, 1994)(sua sponte dismissal on grounds that complaint is frivolous); Brooke v. Carbon County Children & Youth, et al., Civil No. 4:94-CV-1203 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 1994)(complaint sua sponte dismissed as frivolous); Brooke v. Urbanski, Civil No. 4:94-1205, (M.D. Pa. Aug. 15, 1994)(sua sponte dismissal on the basis of frivolousness).
The gist of Plaintiff's present complaint is his contention that the purported conduct of the Defendants interfered with his ability to participate in group counseling and obtain favorable parole consideration. The alleged unconstitutional conduct does not place this inmate in danger of imminent "serious physical injury" at the time his complaint was filed on December 21, 2007. See Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307, 312 (3d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 953 (2001). Pursuant to the standards announced in §1915(g), Brooke's present civil rights action is barred under § 1915(g). An appropriate Order will enter.*fn1
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
3. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause and not taken in good faith.
JAMES F. McCLURE, JR. United States District Judge