IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
December 26, 2007
EUGENE SUTTON, PLAINTIFF
CAPTAIN E. BRADLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 26th day of December, 2007, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 22) of the magistrate judge to which no objections were filed recommending that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 7), which seeks a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order to improve of the conditions of plaintiff's confinement, be denied as moot because plaintiff is no longer incarcerated within this judicial district, and after an independent review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The report and recommendation (Doc. 22) of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 7) for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order is DENIED as moot. See Ibarra-Villalva v. USPAllenwood, 213 F. App'x 132, 134 (3d Cir. 2007) (upholding denial of prisoner's challenge to conditions of confinement as moot because prisoner was transferred to another institution).
3. The above-captioned matter is REMANDED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.