IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
November 16, 2007
IN RE: RODRIGUEZ-ISONA
RENDELL, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
Inmate: Edward Rodriguez-Isona
ID Number: GC-0723
AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2007, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion (Doc. 7) for reconsideration of the order of court dated October 29, 2007 (Doc. 6) which dismissed the above-captioned action without prejudice because plaintiff failed pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 7) is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.