Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Equitable Resources, Inc. v. Trinity Industries

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 16, 2007

EQUITABLE RESOURCES, INC., PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT,
v.
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge McVerry

Magistrate Judge Caiazza

ORDER

In this case, the Plaintiff brought monetary claims based on the Defendants' receipt and use of its natural gas.

The Defendants asserted counterclaims, alleging that their use of the gas was inadvertent, having been caused by the conduct of the Plaintiff. The parties appeared before the undersigned and reached a monetary settlement of the case. After the settlement was reached, but before the agreement was finalized and executed, the Plaintiff attempted to remove its gas meter equipment from the Defendants' premises. The Defendants since have refused to execute the settlement agreement and fulfill their duties under the same.

The Defendants admit that a monetary settlement regarding the provision of gas has been reached. And though the Complaint makes reference to Equitable's "consent[ing] to" the Defendants' retention of the meter equipment, no claims regarding the equipment have been leveled in the Complaint or in the Defendants' Counterclaims.

Simply stated, the equipment issue falls outside the scope of this lawsuit. It is too late for an amendment, moreover, as the only substantive claims in the pleadings have been settled. If either party wishes to address the equipment, another lawsuit will be necessary.

These things being said, the undersigned believes it in everyone's best interests to resolve the equipment dispute without resort to further litigation. The court therefore ORDERS the following: the Plaintiff's Motion to enforce the settlement agreement (Doc. 17) is TEMPORARILY DENIED; the parties' cross-requests for the assessment of sanctions, costs and/or fees are DENIED; and counsel shall appear in the undersigned's chambers for a settlement conference on October 25, 2007 at 2:15 p.m. Counsel shall ensure that persons with full settlement authority are available by telephone, and the parties shall bring with them any documents bearing upon who has ownership or possessory interests in the equipment. Cf., e.g., Defs.' Opp'n Br. (Doc. 18) at 2-3 (suggesting Defendants "paid [for]" equipment); but see id. at 4 (indicating Defendants paid only for installation).

THESE THINGS ARE SO ORDERED.

20071016

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.