IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 13, 2007
WARDELL TYREE, PETITIONER
S.A. YATES, WARDEN, RESPONDENT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2007, upon consideration of petitioner's motion (Doc. 25) seeking reconsideration of the order of court dated July 27, 2007 (Doc. 23), which denied petitioner's request for emergency appointment of counsel because the above-captioned matter is closed,*fn1 and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 25) is DENIED.