IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 1, 2007
RORY M. WALSH, PLAINTIFF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2007, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion (Doc. 213) to strike/seal portions of a document filed by prior counsel for plaintiff, arguing that the second and third sentences of a letter (Doc. 174) filed by plaintiff's former counsel, Richard R. Gan, Esquire, violate the attorney-client privilege and are inflammatory and prejudicial to plaintiff, and the court finding that these sentences do not violate the attorney-client privilege and are not prejudicial or inflammatory,*fn1 it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 213) to strike/seal portions of a document filed by prior counsel is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge