Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hollihan v. Rozum

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


June 8, 2007

RICHARD HOLLIHAN, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
GERALD ROZUM, SUPERINTENDENT; THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AMY REYNOLDS HAY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY; AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; RESPONDENTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Arthur J. Schwab

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2007, after the petitioner, Richard Hollihan, Jr., filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and objections having been filed by Petitioner which are without merit, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 is dismissed prior to service for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied..

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.

Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

20070608

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.