Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Young v. Klem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


May 14, 2007

DANA E. YOUNG, SR., PETITIONER
v.
EDWARD J. KLEM, SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edwin M. Kosik United States District Judge

(Judge Kosik)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2007, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the Petition (Dkt. Entry 1) by certified mail on the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole;

2. Within twenty (20) days of receipt of this Order, Respondents shall answer the allegations in the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in the manner required by Rule 5 of the Rules Governing §2254 Cases in the United States Courts;

3. A Memorandum of Law shall be filed with the Answer. The Memorandum shall contain the relevant facts and procedural history of the case, a recommended disposition of the Petition, and citations to pertinent case law;

4. If the Petitioner chooses to file a Reply, the Reply shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Response;

5. A determination whether the Petitioner should be produced for a hearing will be held in abeyance pending the filing of Respondents' Answer and Memorandum of Law, and the Petitioner's Reply, if he chooses to file one;

6. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. Entry 2) is granted;

20070514

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.