IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 20, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2007, upon consideration of defendant's emergency motion (Doc. 82), requesting that this court clarify its order of January 26, 2007 (see Doc. 79), and it appearing that 22 U.S.C. § 2255 is the appropriate avenue for the defendant's collateral attack on his conviction, see R. GOVERNING § 2255 CASES R. 1 (stating that court 28 U.S.C. § 2255 may be used by "a
person in custody" who seeks a determination that his conviction is "subject to collateral review"), it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's emergency motion (Doc. 82) is CONSTRUED as a motion for reconsideration and is DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.