Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Bennafield

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


February 15, 2007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
SHAUN LANAIL BENNAFIELD, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. Senior United States District Judge

NOTICE AND ORDER TO THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE ACTION:

Your petition for habeas corpus relief, which appears to be a petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, has been received by this Court. You are hereby notified that federal law now requires you to include all of your federal constitutional claims challenging a specific conviction in one habeas corpus petition. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244, 2255; United States v. Miller, 197 F.3d 644 (3d Cir. 1999). In other words, if this petition is denied after consideration of your claims on the merits, you will not be able to file another petition at a later time challenging the same conviction on other grounds, absent exceptional circumstances and certification by the Court of Appeals.

As an unrepresented individual, you are hereby notified that you have the following three options: (1) you may withdraw your pending petition and subsequently file one new, all-inclusive § 2255 petition, which contains every ground for relief which you believe may entitle you to relief from the conviction and sentence you are seeking to challenge, provided that any new § 2255 petition is filed within the one-year statute of limitations; (2) you may amend the § 2255 petition presently on file with the Court with any additional claims or materials in support of your pending claims which you want the Court to consider in ruling on your pending petition; however, if the amendment is not filed within 120 days of the date that the Court receives notice of your intention to amend, the Court will rule on the petition in the form in which it was filed; or (3) you may choose to have the petition ruled on as filed.

You must notify the Court in writing of your choice of one of these three options, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Notice and Order. If no written notification of withdrawal is received within thirty (30) days, the Court will proceed to decide the petition as filed.

This Notice and Order does not enlarge the one-year limitation period set by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or in any other way bear upon the question of whether or not the petition which you filed with the Court in fact was filed within the limitation period. Miller, 197 F.3d at 653, (citing United States v. Duffus, 174 F.3d 333, 337 (3d Cir. cert. denied, 120 S.Ct. (1999)).

20070215

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.