IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 12, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2007, upon consideration of defendant's motion to amend the plea agreement (Doc. 156), requesting that the government be required to treat the property seized from defendant as voluntary restitution payable to Dentsply, and it appearing that defendant has forfeited such property to the United States and has waived his right to contest such forfeiture (Doc. 156, Ex. 2 at ¶ 2), that defendant has acknowledged that he "shall be responsible for making payment of this restitution [to Dentsply] in full" (Doc. 156, Ex. 2 at ¶ 23), and that the plea agreement "supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether written or oral" (Doc. 160, Ex. 2 at ¶ 33),*fn1 it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to amend the plea agreement (Doc. 156) is DENIED.