IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 8, 2007
KEVIN-PAUL WOODRUFF, PLAINTIFF,
A. J. BOOTH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Caputo
Plaintiff, Kevin-Paul Woodruff, an inmate at the United State Penitentiary in Lewisburg ("USP-Lewisburg"), Pennsylvania, commenced this pro se action by filing a Bivens civil rights complaint (Doc. 1). By Order dated October 6, 2006 (Doc. 11), this Court denied Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of that Order. The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence. Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985). Upon consideration of the motion, this Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to provide the evidence required for a successful motion for reconsideration.
ACCORDINGLY, THIS 8th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2007,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 18) is DENIED.
A. RICHARD CAPUTO United States District Judge
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.