Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Walker v. Henkels & McCoy

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


February 6, 2007

SOLOMON L. WALKER, ET AL., PLAINTIFF
v.
HENKELS & MCCOY AND RUSSEL N. WHITSEL, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2007, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 34) for reconsideration filed by defendant Henkels & McCoy, and the court finding that the motion for reconsideration was not timely filed,*fn1 see L.R. 7.10 ("Any motion for reconsideration or reargument shall be filed within ten (10) days after the entry of judgment, order or decree concerned.") (emphasis added), and that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged memorandum and order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence . . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 34) for reconsideration is DENIED.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.