Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Loucks v. Jay

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 8, 2007

DWAYNE E. LOUCKS, PLAINTIFF
v.
JASON JAY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2007, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery deadlines (Doc. 144), and it appearing that counsel has recently undertaken representation of plaintiff, and it further appearing that defendants will not be prejudiced by a reopening of the discovery deadlines, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 144) is GRANTED and the discovery period is REOPENED.

2. Discovery shall conclude on or before March 15, 2007.*fn1

3. Plaintiff's pro se pretrial motions (Docs. 132, 133, 138, 140, 145),are DENIED in light of the fact that plaintiff is now represented by counsel. Plaintiff is advised that the court will not accept any pro se filings and that any future motions are to be filed by his counsel.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.