Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Campbell v. City of New Kensington

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 31, 2006

CRAIG CAMPBELL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, DONALD E. BOWERS, JOHN W. REGOLI JR., MICHAEL J. LANGER DOUGLAS J. AFTANAS, FRANK E. LINK JR., RICHARD JACOBUS, CHARLES FORMAN, CHRISTOPHER E. NICHOLS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: District Judge Joy Flowers Conti

Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff's Complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on April 8, 2005 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order on October 10, 2006. (Doc. No. 54.)

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 56) filed on October 16, 2006, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. No. 54) be denied. Service was made on all counsel of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, that they had ten (10) days to file any objections. Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 58) on October 24, 2006. This Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Objections and notes that Plaintiff has raised issues previously raised in his Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and considered by the Magistrate Judge. Further, Plaintiff has chosen to prosecute this matter in light of his own health issues. After review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2006; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. No. 54) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No.56) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated October 16, 2006, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

The Honorable Joy Flowers Conti United States District Judge

20061031

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.