Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wager v. Rendell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 17, 2006

NEIL J. WAGER, PLAINTIFF
v.
EDWARD G. RENDELL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2006, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motions (Docs. 35, 36) to compel defendants Victoria A. Masek and Dorothy Livaditis to answer interrogatories, and it appearing that defendants have responded to plaintiff's interrogatories, but that plaintiff disagrees with defendants' objections, and it further appearing that plaintiff has not complied with paragraph 5(b) of the Case Management Order (see Doc. 27 ¶ 5(b) ("In the event that discovery disputes arise and are not resolved after counsel attempt in good faith to do so, the matter shall be brought before the court by way of a telephone conference rather than through the filing of formal motions.")), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motions (Docs. 35, 36) are DENIED without prejudice.

2. The court shall initiate a telephone conference with plaintiff and defendants Masek and Livaditis at 2:00 p.m. on Friday, October 20, 2006 to address the discovery issues.*fn1

3. Plaintiff and defendants Masek and Livaditis shall be permitted to submit correspondence regarding the discovery issues, via facsimile, at or before 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 19, 2006.*fn2

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.