IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
October 10, 2006
ROGER W. SPRAGUE, PLAINTIFF
BURTON NEIL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 10th day of October, 2006, upon consideration of the motion to compel (Doc. 34), filed by defendants Burton Neil, Esquire; Burton Neil & Associates, P.C.; Yale D. Weinstein, Esquire; Edward J. O'Brien, Esquire; and Jay H. Pressman, Esquire, and it appearing that defendants filed a brief in support of the motion on September 15, 2006 (see Doc. 35), and that pro se plaintiff*fn1 has not filed a brief in opposition as of the date of this order, see L.R. 7.6 (stating that a brief in opposition is due within fifteen days of the brief in support), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a brief in opposition to the motion to compel (Doc. 34) on or before October 25, 2006. Failure to comply with this order may result in the granting of the motion. See id. (providing that a party who fails to file a brief in opposition to a motion "shall be deemed not to oppose such motion"); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863, 868 (3d Cir. 1984).
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge