Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Walsh v. United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


October 6, 2006

RORY M. WALSH, PLAINTIFF
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2006, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion to hold defendants in contempt, for sanctions, and to require defendants to attend depositions (Doc. 127), and it appearing that the instant motion seeks the resolution of a discovery issue but does not include a certification that plaintiff attempted in good faith to resolve the issue without court intervention, see FED. R. CIV. P. 37(a)(2)(B); see also L.R. 26.3, that five business days is not "reasonable notice" of the depositions,*fn1 see FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(1), the plaintiff's notice to the Navy did not "describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is requested," see id. 30(b)(6), that counsel for defendants properly objected to plaintiff's notice of depositions (see Doc. 140, Ex. B),*fn2 and that plaintiff acknowledges the deficiencies of his prior notices of deposition (see Doc. 141 at 4), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 127) is DENIED.*fn3


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.