IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
September 18, 2006
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA S/B/M/T BANK UNITED OF TEXAS FSB, PLAINTIFF
COSIMO SANTACROCE AND DIANE M. SANTACROCE, DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2006, upon consideration of the motion for default judgment (Doc. 6), and the order of court dated August 22, 2006 (Doc. 12) directing plaintiff to file, on or before September 8, 2006, a supplemental affidavit explaining the discrepancy in the amount of original indebtedness and the alleged principal of debt due and unpaid, and it appearing that plaintiff has not filed a supplemental affidavit as of the date of this order nor requested an enlargement of time, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The motion for default judgment (Doc. 6) is DENIED.
2. On or before September 29, 2006, plaintiff shall show cause why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41; L.R. 83.3.1.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.