Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Santacroce

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 18, 2006

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA S/B/M/T BANK UNITED OF TEXAS FSB, PLAINTIFF
v.
COSIMO SANTACROCE AND DIANE M. SANTACROCE, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2006, upon consideration of the motion for default judgment (Doc. 6), and the order of court dated August 22, 2006 (Doc. 12) directing plaintiff to file, on or before September 8, 2006, a supplemental affidavit explaining the discrepancy in the amount of original indebtedness and the alleged principal of debt due and unpaid, and it appearing that plaintiff has not filed a supplemental affidavit as of the date of this order nor requested an enlargement of time, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion for default judgment (Doc. 6) is DENIED.

2. On or before September 29, 2006, plaintiff shall show cause why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41; L.R. 83.3.1.

20060918

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.