Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martinez-Barren v. Ingram Micro

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


August 29, 2006

PABLO J. MARTINEZ-BARREN, PLAINTIFF
v.
INGRAM MICRO, INC., DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006, upon consideration of the motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Doc. 15),*fn1 and it appearing that defendant has filed an answer to the first amended complaint, see FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) (providing that after a responsive pleading has been served, "a party may amend the party's pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party"); see also id. ("[L]eave shall be freely given when justice so requires."), and that the proposed second amended complaint merely removes claims against defendant, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 15) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove the proposed document (Doc. 15, Ex. 1) from the docket and file it as a second amended complaint as of the date of this order.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.