IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 29, 2006
PABLO J. MARTINEZ-BARREN, PLAINTIFF
INGRAM MICRO, INC., DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006, upon consideration of the motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (Doc. 15),*fn1 and it appearing that defendant has filed an answer to the first amended complaint, see FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) (providing that after a responsive pleading has been served, "a party may amend the party's pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party"); see also id. ("[L]eave shall be freely given when justice so requires."), and that the proposed second amended complaint merely removes claims against defendant, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 15) is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove the proposed document (Doc. 15, Ex. 1) from the docket and file it as a second amended complaint as of the date of this order.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge