IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
August 15, 2006
RORY M. WALSH, PLAINTIFF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2006, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion for a telephone conference (Doc. 98) to discuss the order of court dated August 11, 2006 (Doc. 96), in which the court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, and it appearing that the purpose of the conference is merely to repeat arguments previously addressed by the court (see Docs. 65, 96), see Waye v. First Citizen's Nat'l Bank, 846 F. Supp. 310, 314 (M.D. Pa. 1994) ("A motion for reconsideration is not to be used as a means to reargue matters already argued and disposed of."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for a telephone conference (Doc. 98) is CONSTRUED as a motion for reconsideration and is DENIED as so construed.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.