IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 31, 2006
KEITH BRYANT WEBB, PETITIONER
WARDEN TROY WILLIAMSON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: (Judge Conner)
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2006 upon consideration of petitioner's emergency motions (Docs. 14, 20) to limit the scope of the respondents' response to the petition, and to direct respondents to produce a transcript of a statutory interim hearing, and it appearing that the habeas corpus rules governing both the scope of the response and the transcripts to be produced, see R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 5 ("The Answer and the Reply"); see also, R. 1(b) (applicable to petitions under 28 U.S.C. §2241 in the discretion of the court), R. 5 (sets forth requirements for Answer and Reply), sufficiently explain respondents' obligations with respect to both the filing of an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the production of transcripts, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions (Doc. 14, 20) are DENIED.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.