IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
July 25, 2006
RORY M. WALSH, PLAINTIFF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner
AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2006, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's motion for a telephone conference regarding requests for documents (Doc. 88),*fn1 and it appearing that a telephone conference on discovery issues was held on July 21, 2006 (see Doc. 85),*fn2 and that defendants have responded to plaintiff's discovery requests with objections (see Doc. 86), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 88) is DENIED without prejudice to plaintiff's right to file a motion to compel, specifically setting forth the documents and other discovery requested and their relevance to plaintiff's remaining claims with respect to the alleged burglary of plaintiff's residence in 2005 and addressing defendants' previous objections. If plaintiff files a motion to compel, defendants shall file a response in accordance with federal and local rules of civil procedure.
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge