Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Psonak v. Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


July 21, 2006

ERIC PSONAK, PLAINTIFF
v.
PEOPLES BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS
ERIC PSONAK, PLAINTIFF
v.
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

(Judge Conner)

ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's request to compel the production of information and documents regarding lawsuits and claims under unrelated insurance policies issued by defendants, averring that such discovery is relevant to plaintiff's bad faith, deceit, and/or Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claims, and, following a telephone conference with the parties on this issue, the court finding that plaintiff has not demonstrated the relevance of the requested information and documents and that the request is overly broad and burdensome, see, e.g., McCrink v. Peoples Benefit Life Ins. Co., No. 2:04CV01068, 2004 WL 2743420, at *6 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2004); Cantor v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y, No. 97-5711, 1998 WL 306208, at *3 (E.D. Pa. June 9, 1998); Hyde Athletic Indus., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 969 F. Supp. 289, 307 (E.D. Pa. 1997); Zimmerman v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 167, 173 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's request to compel is DENIED.

20060721

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.