Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dantzler v. Beard

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


April 5, 2006

ALBERT DANTZLER, PLAINTIFF
v.
JEFFREY BEARD; SHARON BUCKS; WILSON; CAROL SCIRE, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay Harry

RE: Doc. no. 14

Judge David Stewart Cercone

MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2006, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's Order dated April 3, 2006, is hereby VACATED.

Upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion for Default, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion (doc. 14) is DISMISSED as moot inasmuch as the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss in lieu of filing an answer and, therefore, consideration of default judgment would be inappropriate. Moreover, default judgment is relief that is generally unavailable in habeas corpus proceedings. Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 138 (6th Cir. 1970(finding Rule 55(a) has no application in habeas corpus cases and the response to a Petition is not an Answer within the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P. 12), superceded on other grounds by statute as stated in Cobb v. Perini, 832 F.2d 342 (6th Cir. 1987); Lemons V. O'Sullivan, 54 F.3d 357, 364 (7th Cir. 1995)(default judgment is disfavored in habeas cases); Alder v. Burt, 240 F.Supp.2d 651, 677 (E.D.Mi. 2003)(default judgment is relief that is unavailable in habeas corpus proceedings).

Further, in a habeas case, the burden is on the Petitioner to show that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution of the United States. Allen, 424 F.2d at 138. "The failure of state officials to file a timely return does not relieve the prisoner of his burden of proof. Id. Accordingly, because there has been no evidentiary hearing and the averments of the Petition have not yet been proved by competent evidence, it appears that the Court would have no authority to grant the writ at this juncture.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff desires review of this Order by the District Judge to whom this case is assigned, plaintiff must file an application with the Clerk of Court within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so will waive the right to appeal. Siers v. Morrash, 700 F.2d 113 (3d Cir. 1983).

AMY REYNOLDS HAY United States Magistrate Judge

20060405

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.