Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Paulino v. Holt

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 31, 2006

SIMEON PAULINO, PETITIONER
v.
RONNIE HOLT, RESPONDENT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2006, upon preliminary review of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1), see R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 4*fn1 (Doc. 1), and it appearing that petitioner intended to include with the form petition an attachment setting forth the pertinent facts (Doc. 1, p. 6), but failed to do so, and it further appearing that the petition, in its present form, is facially insufficient in that the only facts provided are that he is challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding, it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner shall submit the attachment within twenty days of the date of this order. Failure to file the attachment will result in dismissal of the action. See R. GOVERNING § 2254 CASES R. 4.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.