Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Loucks v. Jay

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


March 31, 2006

DWAYNE E. LOUCKS, PLAINTIFF
v.
JASON JAY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2006, upon consideration of plaintiff's fourth motion for motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 111)*fn1 , and it appearing from the complaint, amended complaint, motions and briefs filed by plaintiff, that plaintiff is capable of properly and forcefully prosecuting his claims with adequate investigation and discovery requests and appropriate citations to governing authority, and that resolution of plaintiff's claims neither implicates complex legal or factual issues or requires the testimony of expert witnesses, see Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492, 499 (3d Cir. 2002)(citing Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 155-57 (3d Cir. 1993)), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 111) is DENIED. If further proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel, the matter will be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon motion of plaintiff.

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.