IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
March 24, 2006
ROBERT A. BARRICK, PLAINTIFF,
DR. WILLIAM NEWMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2006, after the plaintiff, Robert A. Barrick, filed a civil rights complaint in the above-captioned case, and after a motion to dismiss the complaint was submitted by the remaining defendants, NaphCare and John Walton, and after a motion for summary judgment was filed by the plaintiff, after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by the plaintiff, and after independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the complaint filed by defendants NaphCare and John Walton (Docket No. 24) is granted, and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 31) is dismissed as moot.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.